On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com> wrote: > A bus reset can trigger a presence detection change and result in a > suprise hotplug. This is generally not what we want to happen when > trying to reset a device. Disable the presence detection control on > on bridges around bus reset.
This is a really interesting situation, and I'm not quite ready to sign up to the idea that this is really a problem and that if it is, this is the way we want to fix it. What would happen if we *did* handle this as a hotplug event, with a removal followed by an add? The scheme where pci_reset_function() does "pci_save_state(dev); pci_dev_reset(dev); pci_restore_state(dev);" makes me nervous. We're saving and restoring some of PCI config space around the reset, but there's no guarantee that we're preserving *all* the important state in config space because I think devices can have non-architected device-specific things in config space that we don't know how to save/restore. Devices also have internal state not exposed via config space. That state is lost during the reset but can't be restored by pci_restore_state(). So it seems like pci_reset_function() is pretending to do something it can't really do reliably. If we make it so a reset is always handled as a remove+add, then we'll use a more generic path, and we'll get all the stuff you expect when initializing a new device -- resource assignment, IRQ setup, quirks, etc. Quirks in particular seem like something we want, but don't currently get with pci_reset_function(). Oh, and the "disable presence detect" approach below only works for things below a PCIe bridge with native hotplug, right? I wonder what happens if we reset devices below a bridge using SHPC or acpiphp. > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.william...@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/pci/pci.c | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----- > 1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci.c b/drivers/pci/pci.c > index 5cb5820..c1f7d77 100644 > --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c > +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c > @@ -3229,8 +3229,8 @@ static int pci_pm_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe) > > static int pci_parent_bus_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, int probe) > { > - u16 ctrl; > - struct pci_dev *pdev; > + u16 ctrl, flags, sltctl = 0; > + struct pci_dev *pdev, *bridge; > > if (pci_is_root_bus(dev->bus) || dev->subordinate || !dev->bus->self) > return -ENOTTY; > @@ -3242,15 +3242,34 @@ static int pci_parent_bus_reset(struct pci_dev *dev, > int probe) > if (probe) > return 0; > > - pci_read_config_word(dev->bus->self, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &ctrl); > + bridge = dev->bus->self; > + > + /* > + * If the parent device supports a slot with presence detection > + * change enabled, holding the bus in reset can trigger that and > + * cause an unwanted surprise removal. Disable presence detection > + * around the bus reset. > + */ > + pcie_capability_read_word(bridge, PCI_EXP_FLAGS, &flags); > + if (flags & PCI_EXP_FLAGS_SLOT) { > + pcie_capability_read_word(bridge, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, &sltctl); > + if (sltctl & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PDCE) > + pcie_capability_write_word(bridge, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, > + sltctl & > ~PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PDCE); > + } > + > + pci_read_config_word(bridge, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, &ctrl); > ctrl |= PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_BUS_RESET; > - pci_write_config_word(dev->bus->self, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, ctrl); > + pci_write_config_word(bridge, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, ctrl); > msleep(100); > > ctrl &= ~PCI_BRIDGE_CTL_BUS_RESET; > - pci_write_config_word(dev->bus->self, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, ctrl); > + pci_write_config_word(bridge, PCI_BRIDGE_CONTROL, ctrl); > msleep(100); > > + if (sltctl & PCI_EXP_SLTCTL_PDCE) > + pcie_capability_write_word(bridge, PCI_EXP_SLTCTL, sltctl); > + > return 0; > } > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/