On Friday, February 15, 2013 3:04 PM, Venu Byravarasu wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-kernel-
> > ow...@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Jingoo Han
> > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2013 11:29 AM
> > To: 'Andrew Morton'
> > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 'Alessandro Zummo'; rtc-
> > li...@googlegroups.com; 'Jingoo Han'
> > Subject: [PATCH 03/11] rtc: rtc-efi: use pr_err()/pr_warn() instead of
> > printk()
> >
> > Fixed the checkpatch warnings as below:
> >
> > WARNING: Prefer netdev_err(netdev, ... then dev_err(dev, ... then
> > pr_err(...
> > to printk(KERN_ERR ...
> > WARNING: please, no space before tabs
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han <jg1....@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/rtc/rtc-efi.c | 10 ++++++----
> > 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > eft->timezone = EFI_UNSPECIFIED_TIMEZONE;
> > @@ -142,7 +144,7 @@ static int efi_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct
> > rtc_wkalrm *wkalrm)
> > */
> > status = efi.set_wakeup_time((efi_bool_t)wkalrm->enabled, &eft);
> >
> > - printk(KERN_WARNING "write status is %d\n", (int)status);
> > + pr_warn("write status is %d\n", (int)status);
>
> Why don't you use dev_warn itself?
OK, I will change it.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
>
> >
> > return status == EFI_SUCCESS ? 0 : -EINVAL;
> > }
> > @@ -157,7 +159,7 @@ static int efi_read_time(struct device *dev, struct
> > rtc_time *tm)
> >
> > if (status != EFI_SUCCESS) {
> > /* should never happen */
> > - printk(KERN_ERR "efitime: can't read time\n");
> > + pr_err("can't read time\n");
>
> Why don't you use dev_err itself?
>
> > return -EINVAL;
> > }
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.2.5
> >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
> > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
