On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 3:56 PM, Andy Shevchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Linus Walleij <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Andy Shevchenko >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I have not checked the code but there is a possibility that custom >>> pool->lock >>> is not needed at all due to dma_pool contains it's own lock. >> >> Can you please change the description to something like: >> >> "The coh901318_lli allocator releases a lock on the exit path without >> taking it first". > > In v2 (that by fact already applied) I put following description: > > In case the len is 0 we must return without trying to unlock the > lock that was > not locked. > > Does it fit your suggestion?
Sure, acked-by. Thanks, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
