On 02/18/2013 04:44 PM, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > Hello, Alex. > > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 01:07:37PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote: >> If the waked/execed task is transitory enough, it will has a chance to be >> packed into a cpu which is busy but still has time to care it. >> For powersaving policy, only the history util < 25% task has chance to >> be packed, and for balance policy, only histroy util < 12.5% has chance. >> If there is no cpu eligible to handle it, will use a idlest cpu in >> leader group. > > After exec(), task's behavior may be changed, and history util may be > changed, too. So, IMHO, exec balancing by history util is not good idea. > How do you think about it? >
sounds make sense. are there any objections? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/