Namjae Jeon <[email protected]> writes:
> + if (MSDOS_SB(inode->i_sb)->options.nfs == FAT_NFS_NOSTALE_RO) {
> + if (inode->i_ino == MSDOS_ROOT_INO)
> + stat->ino = MSDOS_ROOT_INO;
Can we simply set i_pos = MSDOS_ROOT_INO in fat_read_root()? If so, I
think we can avoid this check.
> + else
> + /* Use i_pos for ino. This is used as fileid of nfs. */
> + stat->ino = fat_i_pos_read(MSDOS_SB(inode->i_sb),
> + inode);
> + }
> return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fat_getattr);
> +struct fat_fid {
> + u32 i_gen;
> + u32 i_pos_low;
> + u16 i_pos_hi;
> + u16 parent_i_pos_hi;
> + u32 parent_i_pos_low;
> + u32 parent_i_gen;
> +} __packed;
Do we need to use __packed? Unnecessary __packed can generate slower
code for alignment check on arch has unaligned fault.
> + if (parent && (len < FAT_FID_SIZE_WITH_PARENT)) {
> + *lenp = FAT_FID_SIZE_WITH_PARENT;
> + return 255;
> + } else if (len < FAT_FID_SIZE_WITHOUT_PARENT) {
> + *lenp = FAT_FID_SIZE_WITHOUT_PARENT;
> + return 255;
> + }
This check strange. "parent && len == FAT_FID_SIZE_WITHOUT_PARENT" will
overwrite over limit of fh size?
--
OGAWA Hirofumi <[email protected]>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
