george anzinger wrote: > If we are to do high-res-timers, I think we will always have to do some > sort of a sort on insert. Yes, that's called a priority queue... (And you don't actually sort on each insertion). -- Jamie - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! Bret Indrelee
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! george anzinger
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! Bret Indrelee
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! george anzinger
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! Bret Indrelee
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! Ben Greear
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! george anzinger
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! Jamie Lokier
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! george anzinger
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! Jamie Lokier
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! Horst von Brand
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! george anzinger
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! Jamie Lokier
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! Ben Greear
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! Jamie Lokier
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! Mark Salisbury
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! george anzinger
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! george anzinger
- Re: No 100 HZ timer! Mark Salisbury