On Sat, 2013-02-16 at 12:59 -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>  
> > diff --git a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> > index 2b0484a..bac1906 100644
> > --- a/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> > +++ b/kernel/rcutiny_plugin.h
> > @@ -552,7 +552,7 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct 
> > *t)
> >             rcu_preempt_cpu_qs();
> > 
> >     /* Hardware IRQ handlers cannot block. */
> > -   if (in_irq()) {
> > +   if (preempt_count() & (HARDIRQ_MASK | SOFTIRQ_OFFSET)) {
> 
> For whatever it is worth, in mainline this is:
> 
>       if (in_irq() || in_serving_softirq()) {
> 
> The definition of in_serving_softirq() is a bit different:
> 
> #define in_serving_softirq()    (softirq_count() & SOFTIRQ_OFFSET)
> 
> This might be due to differences between mainline and -rt, but thought
> it worth calling attention to.
> 

Right, and we should avoid open coding HARDIRQ_MASK and SOFTIRQ_OFFSET. 
And note, -rt is slowly creeping into mainline. It's better to have
things like this nicely tidied up.

-- Steve


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to