Hey, again. On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 11:27:50AM -0800, Tejun Heo wrote: > 0001 is problematic because it adds a hash lookup which isn't > necessary. In this series, it's okay as the later lookup is removed > eventually but without that, I don't think it's a good idea to apply > 0001. > > 0002 looks good to me. > > 0005, I'm not sure what the benefit would be without later changes. > > 0006-0008 yeah, probably. > > I'll try to apply them on top of wq/for-3.9.
So, I picked and applied 2, 6-8 on a temp branch. FYI, note that I'm currently sitting on top of a bunch of patches implementing custom worker_pools and likely to prioritize them over other conflicting changes. I'm expecting to send these out in a week or so. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
