On Wed, 20 Feb 2013 01:54:32 +0400 Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcu...@openvz.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 01:42:56PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > Index: linux-2.6.git/kernel/Makefile > > > =================================================================== > > > --- linux-2.6.git.orig/kernel/Makefile > > > +++ linux-2.6.git/kernel/Makefile > > > @@ -25,9 +25,7 @@ endif > > > obj-y += sched/ > > > obj-y += power/ > > > > > > -ifeq ($(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE),y) > > > -obj-$(CONFIG_X86) += kcmp.o > > > -endif > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_KCMP) += kcmp.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_FREEZER) += freezer.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_PROFILING) += profile.o > > > obj-$(CONFIG_STACKTRACE) += stacktrace.o > > > > This permits people to select kcmp with CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE=n. > > Is there any point in doing that? > > > > What would be wrong with just doing > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE) += kcmp.o > > I think this syscall is usefull even without c/r stuff. > That's why I made it with separate config option. hm, OK. But the patch also permits CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE=y, CONFIG_KCMP=n which surely isn't something which CRIU wants to support? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/