On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 03:01:23PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 09:38:52 +0800 > Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> wrote: > > > Chuansheng, > > > > It works fine on tip/next. Thanks for the fix! > > > > Tested-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang...@intel.com> > > How did you test this? What did you do?
I used the same kconfig to build a kernel from tip/next HEAD *plus* the v2 patch. The result is, no smp_call_function_single/many warnings are observed. > afacit the patch adds additional warnings, so you must have had some > buggy code and with the patch, runtime warnings are generated which > inform you of that bug? Andrew, the background is: Ingo has *reverted* the original patch that triggered the smp_call_function_single warning from his tip tree, so the test result means this patch's warning messages won't trigger in my test boots. Thanks, Fengguang -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
