On Mon, 2013-02-18 at 13:07 +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> @@ -4214,6 +4214,11 @@ struct sd_lb_stats {
> unsigned int busiest_group_weight;
>
> int group_imb; /* Is there imbalance in this sd */
> +
> + /* Varibles of power awaring scheduling */
> + unsigned int sd_utils; /* sum utilizations of this domain */
> + unsigned long sd_capacity; /* capacity of this domain */
> + struct sched_group *group_leader; /* Group which relieves
> group_min */
> };
>
> /*
> @@ -4229,6 +4234,7 @@ struct sg_lb_stats {
> unsigned long group_weight;
> int group_imb; /* Is there an imbalance in the group ? */
> int group_has_capacity; /* Is there extra capacity in the
> group? */
> + unsigned int group_utils; /* sum utilizations of group
> */
> };
So I have two problems with the _utils name, firstly its a single value
and therefore we shouldn't give it a name in plural, secondly, whenever
I read utils I read utilities, not utilizations.
As a non native speaker I'm not entirely sure, but utilizations sounds
iffy to me, is there even a plural of utilization?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
