Dear Tim,
Am Mittwoch, den 20.02.2013, 23:16 +0100 schrieb Paul Menzel:
> Am Mittwoch, den 20.02.2013, 13:31 -0700 schrieb Tim Gardner:
>
> Noting the `gcc` version and build environment is never wrong. ;-)
>
> > drivers/md/dm-raid.c: In function 'raid_ctr':
> > drivers/md/dm-raid.c:453:53: warning: 'rebuilds_per_group' may be used
> > uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
> > drivers/md/dm-raid.c:383:11: note: 'rebuilds_per_group' was declared here
> >
> > It appears unlikely that rebuilds_per_group could be used before set,
>
> Why? Otherwise the compiler would not complain, right?
>
> > but set it to 0 anyways just to shutup GCC.
>
> Unfortunately I do not know what linux-next version you tested, so the
> line numbers are off in.
>
> $ git describe
> v3.7.5-4-g9c2ab66
See below …
> > Cc: Alasdair Kergon <a...@redhat.com>
> > Cc: dm-de...@redhat.com
> > Cc: Neil Brown <ne...@suse.de>
> > Cc: linux-r...@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Gardner <tim.gard...@canonical.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/md/dm-raid.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> > index 9d6bf19..8005caf 100644
Git to the rescue. I guess I should be able to find that commit to make
sense of the line numbers.
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-raid.c
> > @@ -380,7 +380,7 @@ static int validate_region_size(struct raid_set *rs,
> > unsigned long region_size)
> > static int validate_raid_redundancy(struct raid_set *rs)
> > {
> > unsigned i, rebuild_cnt = 0;
> > - unsigned rebuilds_per_group, copies, d;
> > + unsigned rebuilds_per_group = 0, copies, d;
> > unsigned group_size, last_group_start;
> >
> > for (i = 0; i < rs->md.raid_disks; i++)
Thanks,
Paul
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
