On 2/21/2013 10:35 AM, Nathan Zimmer wrote: > >> This comment is useful around the cpumask functions. >> >> Returns >= nr_cpu_ids if no further cpus set. >> > I had assumed it would be = nr_cpu_ids. > I will need to rethink the iterator.
Yes it is actually equal to the nr_cpu_ids in my error case. On my system, nr_cpu_ids = 4 and I only have one cpu online. > > > Also I retested my other patches in the series, the ones for schedstat > and sched_debug, and those worked fine. I haven't tried those yet. I will try to take a look. Also, can't we simplify the code by calling cpumask_next() with the first argument being -1? No more cpu > 0 check? -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
