On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 4:15 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <r...@sisk.pl> wrote: > On Friday, February 22, 2013 12:56:01 AM Thomas Gleixner wrote: >> Just booted linus head on one of my old kvm based testing systems and >> got the following splat: >> >> [ 0.531910] BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at >> 0000000000000024 >> [ 0.532173] IP: [<ffffffff812f1bd2>] apei_hest_parse+0xd2/0xf0 >> [ 0.532173] PGD 0 >> [ 0.532173] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP >> [ 0.532173] Modules linked in: >> [ 0.532173] CPU 3 >> [ 0.532173] Pid: 1, comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 3.8.0+ #195 Bochs Bochs >> [ 0.532173] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff812f1bd2>] [<ffffffff812f1bd2>] >> apei_hest_parse+0xd2/0xf0 >> [ 0.532173] RSP: 0000:ffff88021685be78 EFLAGS: 00010206 >> [ 0.532173] RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: >> 0000000000000000 >> [ 0.532173] RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: >> 0000000000000028 >> [ 0.532173] RBP: ffff88021685be98 R08: 00000000804efb06 R09: >> 0000000000000000 >> [ 0.532173] R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: >> ffffffff81af3d40 >> [ 0.532173] R13: ffffffff812bcb23 R14: 0000000000000000 R15: >> 0000000000000000 >> [ 0.532173] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88021fcc0000(0000) >> knlGS:0000000000000000 >> [ 0.532173] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 >> [ 0.532173] CR2: 0000000000000024 CR3: 0000000001a0c000 CR4: >> 00000000000406a0 >> [ 0.532173] DR0: 0000000000000000 DR1: 0000000000000000 DR2: >> 0000000000000000 >> [ 0.532173] DR3: 0000000000000000 DR6: 00000000ffff0ff0 DR7: >> 0000000000000400 >> [ 0.532173] Process swapper/0 (pid: 1, threadinfo ffff88021685a000, task >> ffff8802168c0000) >> [ 0.532173] Stack: >> [ 0.532173] 00000000fffffffa ffffffff81af3d40 0000000000000000 >> 000000001fb3f55a >> [ 0.532173] ffff88021685bea8 ffffffff812bcbe4 ffff88021685bec8 >> ffffffff81af3d5c >> [ 0.532173] 0000000000000030 0000000000000030 ffff88021685bef8 >> ffffffff8100023b >> [ 0.532173] Call Trace: >> [ 0.532173] [<ffffffff81af3d40>] ? pcie_portdrv_init+0x7a/0x7a >> [ 0.532173] [<ffffffff812bcbe4>] aer_acpi_firmware_first+0x20/0x30 >> [ 0.532173] [<ffffffff81af3d5c>] aer_service_init+0x1c/0x35 >> [ 0.532173] [<ffffffff8100023b>] do_one_initcall+0x57/0x13c >> [ 0.532173] [<ffffffff81ad2d39>] kernel_init_freeable+0x142/0x1d1 >> [ 0.532173] [<ffffffff81ad254f>] ? loglevel+0x31/0x31 >> [ 0.532173] [<ffffffff815a8cef>] ? rest_init+0xc3/0xc3 >> [ 0.532173] [<ffffffff815a8cfd>] kernel_init+0xe/0xd6 >> [ 0.532173] [<ffffffff815bc73c>] ret_from_fork+0x7c/0xb0 >> [ 0.532173] [<ffffffff815a8cef>] ? rest_init+0xc3/0xc3 >> [ 0.532173] Code: 14 0f b7 77 02 31 c0 48 c7 c7 65 c1 83 81 e8 35 1a 2c >> 00 eb 23 4c 89 f6 41 ff d5 85 c0 75 1e 4c 89 e7 ff c3 48 8b 05 a6 5b 7c 00 >> <3b> 58 24 0f 82 5a ff ff ff 31 c0 eb 05 b8 ea ff ff ff 5b 41 5c >> >> git bisect identified the following commit: >> >> commit 92ef2a25c763338905dce8344a0584606f842920 >> Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> >> Date: Fri Dec 21 00:36:40 2012 +0100 >> >> ACPI: Change the ordering of PCI root bridge driver registrarion >> >> A revert is impossible w/o major surgery, so I'm going to bed and let >> the involved folks think about it. > > Can you please post a dmesg boot log from v3.8 on the same system? >
looks at the code flow, acpi_hest_init() is called early correctly. later aer_acpi_firmware_first() should not hit hest_tab is NULL, but hest_disable is not set. could be some data corruption.. near hest_disable or hest_tab. Thanks Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
