On Fri, 22 Feb 2013, Frederic Weisbecker wrote: > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 03:33:51PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > The minimal extra check at the end of irq_exit() is way better than > > any other special cased workaround and the softirq stuff is really the > > only thing which needs to be taken care of. Anything else just works. > > Yeah that's indeed a point in favour of this patch. > > I prefer to let you guys have the final word on this patch. Whether you > apply it or not, I fear I'll never be entirely happy either way :) > That's the sad fate of dealing with circular dependencies...
plus the butt ugly softirq semantics or the lack thereof ... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
