As uninitialized array members will be initialized to zero, we can avoid using a for loop by setting a value to it.
Signed-off-by: Emilio López <[email protected]> --- Note that I don't own any device using this driver, it has only been compile tested, but it shouldn't cause any issues. Changes v1 -> v2: * Move freq / 1000000 to the array definition as suggested by Viresh Kumar drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c index 66e3a71..b61b5a3 100644 --- a/drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/highbank-cpufreq.c @@ -28,13 +28,7 @@ static int hb_voltage_change(unsigned int freq) { - int i; - u32 msg[HB_CPUFREQ_IPC_LEN]; - - msg[0] = HB_CPUFREQ_CHANGE_NOTE; - msg[1] = freq / 1000000; - for (i = 2; i < HB_CPUFREQ_IPC_LEN; i++) - msg[i] = 0; + u32 msg[HB_CPUFREQ_IPC_LEN] = {HB_CPUFREQ_CHANGE_NOTE, freq / 1000000}; return pl320_ipc_transmit(msg); } -- 1.8.2.rc0 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
