Hi Dmitry, On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 10:18 AM, Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 09:24:38AM -0800, Simon Glass wrote: >> We now have a binding which adds two parameters to the matrix keypad DT >> node. This is separate from the GPIO-driven matrix keypad binding, and >> unfortunately incompatible, since that uses row-gpios/col-gpios for the >> row and column counts. >> >> So the easiest option here is to provide a function for non-GPIO drivers >> to use to decode the binding. >> >> Note: We could in fact create an entirely separate structure to hold >> these two fields, but it does not seem worth it, yet. If we have more >> parameters then we can add this, and then refactor each driver to hold >> such a structure. >> >> Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <[email protected]> >> Tested-by: Sourav Poddar <[email protected]> (v2) > > Acked-by: Dmitry Torokhov <[email protected]> > > I suppose the EC driver will go through MFD tree, right?
Yes I expect so. Regards, Simon > > -- > Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
