On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:28:34PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote: > From: Magnus Damm <[email protected]> > > This patch adds a driver for external IRQ pins connected > to the INTC block on recent SoCs from Renesas. > So how exactly does this interact with the existing sh_intc code? Or is there some reason why you have opted to bypass it in order to implement a simplified reduced-functionality version of INTC support focused only on external pins? If both are used together this is going to be a nightmare for locking, and it's also non-obvious how the IRQ domains on both sides will interact.
This needs a lot more explanation. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
