On Thu, 28 Feb 2013 00:25:07 -0500 kosaki.motoh...@gmail.com wrote: > From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motoh...@jp.fujitsu.com> > > Currently, n_new is wrongly initialized. start and end parameter > are inverted. Let's fix it. > > ... > > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c > @@ -2390,7 +2390,7 @@ static int shared_policy_replace(struct shared_policy > *sp, unsigned long start, > > *mpol_new = *n->policy; > atomic_set(&mpol_new->refcnt, 1); > - sp_node_init(n_new, n->end, end, mpol_new); > + sp_node_init(n_new, end, n->end, mpol_new); > n->end = start; > sp_insert(sp, n_new); > n_new = NULL;
huh. What were the runtime effects of this problem? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
