On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Michel Lespinasse <wal...@google.com> wrote: > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Emmanuel Benisty <benist...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 7:16 AM, Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bu...@hp.com> >> wrote: >>> The following set of not-thoroughly-tested patches are based on the >>> discussion of holding the ipc lock unnecessarily, such as for permissions >>> and security checks: >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/2/28/540 >>> >>> Patch 0/1: Introduces new functions, analogous to ipc_lock and >>> ipc_lock_check >>> in the ipc utility code, allowing to obtain the ipc object without holding >>> the lock. >>> >>> Patch 0/2: Use the new functions and only acquire the ipc lock when needed. >> >> Not sure how much a work in progress this is but my machine dies >> immediately when I start chromium, crappy mobile phone picture here: >> http://i.imgur.com/S0hfPz3.jpg > > We are missing the top of the trace there, so it's hard to be sure - > however, this could well be caused by the if (!out) check (instead of > if (IS_ERR(out)) that I noticed in patch 1/2.
Merci Michel but unfortunately, I'm still getting the same issue. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/