On Sat, Mar 02, 2013 at 08:15:22AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 08:12 -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>
> > Hmm, actually it seems to be complaining everywhere but in trace.c which
> > is where the per_cpu was allocated. Do I need to annotate the trace.h
> > header to specify (at least to sparse) that the pointer is allocated per
> > cpu?
>
> I guess I need this patch:
That's it! Verified with
make C=1 kernel/trace/trace_functions.o
Thanks,
Fengguang
> diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace.h b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> index c597523..50a9c81 100644
> --- a/kernel/trace/trace.h
> +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.h
> @@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ struct trace_array {
> struct list_head systems;
> struct list_head events;
> struct task_struct *waiter;
> - struct trace_array_cpu *data;
> + struct trace_array_cpu __percpu *data;
> };
>
> enum {
>
> -- Steve
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
