Hi James,

On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 16:22:15 +0000 James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com> wrote:
>
> On 2 March 2013 15:48, Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 10:22:40 +0000 James Hogan <james.ho...@imgtec.com> 
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Okay, I've rebased the arch/metag tree onto mainline to make all the
> >> back-merges unnecessary and applied those simple fixes into "Build
> >> infrastructure" and "Various other headers" commits (additionally
> >> trivially removing ARCH_NO_VIRT_TO_BUS which is also now unnecessary).
> >
> > Pleas make sure that what you are submitting to Linus is the same as what
> > you have in linux-next (i.e. reset your for-next branch as well).
> 
> Yes, for-next now moved to the rebased version.

Thanks.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    s...@canb.auug.org.au

Attachment: pgpbE8QfBo7Gp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to