2013-03-02 (토), 12:40 +0900, Namjae Jeon: > From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.j...@samsung.com> > > Instead of checking for victim_segmap(FG_GC) OR > (gc_type == BG_GC) && victim_segmap(BG_GC); > to continue for the victim selection. The 2 conditions > can simply be merged and decision can directly be made using 'gc_type'. > > Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon <namjae.j...@samsung.com> > Signed-off-by: Amit Sahrawat <a.sahra...@samsung.com> > --- > fs/f2fs/gc.c | 5 +---- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/gc.c b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > index 94b8a0c..16b4148 100644 > --- a/fs/f2fs/gc.c > +++ b/fs/f2fs/gc.c > @@ -266,10 +266,7 @@ static int get_victim_by_default(struct f2fs_sb_info > *sbi, > } > p.offset = ((segno / p.ofs_unit) * p.ofs_unit) + p.ofs_unit; > > - if (test_bit(segno, dirty_i->victim_segmap[FG_GC])) > - continue; > - if (gc_type == BG_GC && > - test_bit(segno, dirty_i->victim_segmap[BG_GC])) > + if (test_bit(segno, dirty_i->victim_segmap[gc_type]))
Negative. We should check FG_GC all the time. Thanks, > continue; > if (IS_CURSEC(sbi, GET_SECNO(sbi, segno))) > continue; -- Jaegeuk Kim Samsung
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
