On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 10:05:51PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 09:43:11PM +0200, Alexandru Gheorghiu wrote: > > Removed unused function nfnl_get_lock which fixed the following warning: > > net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c:65:22: warning: ‘nfnl_get_lock’ defined but not > > used [-Wunused-function] > > > > Signed-off-by: Alexandru Gheorghiu <gheorghiuan...@gmail.com> > > --- > > net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c | 5 ----- > > 1 file changed, 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c > > index d578ec2..44aa0a7 100644 > > --- a/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c > > +++ b/net/netfilter/nfnetlink.c > > @@ -62,11 +62,6 @@ void nfnl_unlock(__u8 subsys_id) > > } > > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nfnl_unlock); > > > > -static struct mutex *nfnl_get_lock(__u8 subsys_id) > > -{ > > - return &table[subsys_id].mutex; > > -} > > - > > I see the same warning here, gcc (Debian 4.7.2-5) 4.7.2. > > Actually this function *is* used a bit further in the same file in > nfnetlink_rcv_msg(). > > But gcc complains for some reason of which I don't even have the > slightest idea. However, if you declare the above function "static > inline..." the warning is gone.
Already got a fix for compilation warning in my tree: http://1984.lsi.us.es/git/nf/commit/?id=9df9e7832391cf699abbf39fc8d95d7e78297462 Thanks! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/