On Tue, Mar 05, 2013 at 12:52:41PM +0800, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> +static void put_cluster_clk_and_freq_table(u32 cluster)
> +{
> +     if (!atomic_dec_return(&cluster_usage[cluster])) {
> +             clk_put(clk[cluster]);
> +             clk[cluster] = NULL;

What's the point in setting the clk to NULL?

> +static int get_cluster_clk_and_freq_table(u32 cluster)
> +{
> +     char name[9] = "cluster";
> +     int count;
> +
> +     if (atomic_inc_return(&cluster_usage[cluster]) != 1)
> +             return 0;
> +
> +     freq_table[cluster] = arm_bL_ops->get_freq_tbl(cluster, &count);
> +     if (!freq_table[cluster])
> +             goto atomic_dec;
> +
> +     name[7] = cluster + '0';
> +     clk[cluster] = clk_get(NULL, name);
> +     if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(clk[cluster])) {

NAK.  Two reasons.

1. IS_ERR_OR_NULL.  You know about this, it's been on the list several
   times.

2. Maybe clk_get_sys() rather than clk_get() and use a sensible device
   name ("cpu-cluster.%u" maybe) rather than a connection name with a
   NULL device?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to