On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 12:58 PM, H. Peter Anvin <h...@linux.intel.com> wrote:

> Excellent.  Yinghai, can you write up the patch with a proper
> description and I'll put it into x86/urgent.

I made it more robust: make sure real_end have 8M below it.
Please check attached one.

Thanks

Yinghai

Attachment: fix_real_end_v2.patch
Description: Binary data

Reply via email to