On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Oleg Nesterov <o...@redhat.com> wrote: > On 03/08, Lucas De Marchi wrote: >> >> static int call_usermodehelper_keys(char *path, char **argv, char **envp, >> struct key *session_keyring, int wait) >> { >> - return call_usermodehelper_fns(path, argv, envp, wait, >> - umh_keys_init, umh_keys_cleanup, >> - key_get(session_keyring)); >> + struct subprocess_info *info; >> + >> + info = call_usermodehelper_setup(path, argv, envp, GFP_KERNEL, >> + umh_keys_init, umh_keys_cleanup, >> + key_get(session_keyring)); >> + if (!info) { >> + key_put(session_keyring); >> + return -ENOMEM; >> + } >> + >> + return call_usermodehelper_exec(info, wait); > > Looks correct, but can't we simpluify it a bit? > > info = call_usermodehelper_setup(session_keyring); > if (!info) > return ENOMEM; > > key_get(session_keyring)); > return call_usermodehelper_exec(info);
Yep, looks better this way. Lucas De Marchi -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/