On Monday 11 March 2013, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> > I don't have a strong opinion here, so that would be fine with me.
> > Greg, Arnd, would mei_cl_device and mei_cl_driver be an acceptable
> > compromise?
> I'm re-opening this topic now that the merge window is closed: So would you
> guys take mei_cl_device and mei_cl_driver as an acceptable solution or (as you
> hinted earlier) are mei_device and mei_driver the only naming scheme that
> you'd accept ?
I'd prefer the latter, but I wouldn't insist on it if you have good reasons
to use the former.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
