[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In the long run, it probably makes sense to adjust the algorithms to
> allow for non-power-of-two inode sizes,
If you don't mind, does that imply packing inodes across block
boundaries?
Regards,
Jeff
--
Jeff Garzik | "The universe is like a safe to which there is a
Building 1024 | combination -- but the combination is locked up
MandrakeSoft | in the safe." -- Peter DeVries
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- ext2 inode size (on-disk) Alexander Viro
- Re: ext2 inode size (on-disk) Andreas Dilger
- Re: ext2 inode size (on-disk) Alexander Viro
- Re: ext2 inode size (on-disk) Andreas Dilger
- Re: ext2 inode size (on-disk) Alexander Viro
- Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk) tytso
- Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk) Jeff Garzik
- Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk) Theodore Tso
- Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk) Alexander Viro
- Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk) Andreas Dilger
- Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk) Theodore Tso
- Re: [Ext2-devel] ext2 inode size (on-disk) Theodore Tso

