On Tuesday 12 March 2013, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Thanks, I will fix this in the next version. > > Btw, if this (or rather the next iteration) gets merged, may I suggest to > do it through the GPIO tree instead of having each architecture picking the > patches of relevance. A considerable number of other patches that depend on > this will follow and this will ensure they are picked in the right order.
Sounds reasonable, but I would also suggest you prepare a branch that can get merged into the GPIO, ARM, PowerPC and MIPS trees to avoid merge conflicts in that case, since these all will have a number of changes conflicting with yours. In the end, I would not care which tree it gets merged through, as long as all have the same version of your patches. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/