On 03/12/13 11:41, David Brown wrote:
> @@ -261,56 +263,13 @@ int msm_ssbi_write(struct device *dev, u16 addr, u8 
> *buf, int len)
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(msm_ssbi_write);
>  
> -static int msm_ssbi_add_slave(struct msm_ssbi *ssbi,
> -                             const struct msm_ssbi_slave_info *slave)
> -{
> -     struct platform_device *slave_pdev;
> -     int ret;
> -
> -     if (ssbi->slave) {
> -             pr_err("slave already attached??\n");
> -             return -EBUSY;
> -     }
> -
> -     slave_pdev = platform_device_alloc(slave->name, -1);
> -     if (!slave_pdev) {
> -             pr_err("cannot allocate pdev for slave '%s'", slave->name);
> -             ret = -ENOMEM;
> -             goto err;
> -     }
> -
> -     slave_pdev->dev.parent = ssbi->dev;
> -     slave_pdev->dev.platform_data = slave->platform_data;
> -
> -     ret = platform_device_add(slave_pdev);
> -     if (ret) {
> -             pr_err("cannot add slave platform device for '%s'\n",
> -                             slave->name);
> -             goto err;
> -     }
> -
> -     ssbi->slave = &slave_pdev->dev;
> -     return 0;
> -
> -err:
> -     if (slave_pdev)
> -             platform_device_put(slave_pdev);
> -     return ret;
> -}
> -
>  static int msm_ssbi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  {
> -     const struct msm_ssbi_platform_data *pdata = pdev->dev.platform_data;

Now that all this code is gone do we have a user of the
msm_ssbi_platform_data struct? Why not remove it from the header file?
If you remove it from the header you can probably move the enum for
controller_type into this file too.

> @@ -334,7 +293,25 @@ static int msm_ssbi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       ssbi->dev = &pdev->dev;
>       platform_set_drvdata(pdev, ssbi);
>  
> -     ssbi->controller_type = pdata->controller_type;
> +     type = of_get_property(np, "qcom,controller-type", NULL);
> +     if (type == NULL) {
> +             pr_err("Missing qcom,controller-type property\n");

This could be dev_err() considering you use dev_info() below.
> +             ret = -EINVAL;
> +             goto err_ssbi_controller;
> +     }
> +     dev_info(&pdev->dev, "SSBI controller type: '%s'\n", type);
> +     if (strcmp(type, "ssbi") == 0)
> +             ssbi->controller_type = MSM_SBI_CTRL_SSBI;
> +     else if (strcmp(type, "ssbi2") == 0)
> +             ssbi->controller_type = MSM_SBI_CTRL_SSBI2;
> +     else if (strcmp(type, "pmic-arbiter") == 0)
> +             ssbi->controller_type = MSM_SBI_CTRL_PMIC_ARBITER;
> +     else {
> +             pr_err("Unknown qcom,controller-type\n");

dev_err()?

> @@ -370,12 +347,18 @@ static int msm_ssbi_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>       return 0;
>  }
>  
> +static struct of_device_id ssbi_match_table[] = {

const?

-- 
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to