> Hmm...i guess there is a communication issue here. It sounds like the
> message that our ML server was sending was misleading. We were not
> rejecting mail because of content. The ML server was rejecting it
because
> the address was not subscribed. Our idea was that we don't want spam.
> If it's completely unmoderated, then we will get a *lot* of spam.
I do not think there is a miscommunication here. First, someone gets an
e-mail saying that your message "waits for moderator's approval". Then
you get a message saying that your "message was rejected by the
moderator because you are not subscribed to the list".
Mind it, those were bug reports, not spam. I took your beta code, tested
it, saw real bugs and problems and wrote bug reports BECAUSE YOU
INCOURAGE PEOPLE TO DO SO AND GIVE THOSE EMAILS IN THE DOCUMENTATION!!!
There is no place in the source tree docs that say the list is
moderated. It it had said so, I would have not wasted my time. I felt
really pissed off for waisting my time. BTW, other e-mails given in the
documentation just bounce. If you do not want people sending bug
reports, update your documentation. It is not polite to make people
waste their time!
--
----------------------------------------
Constantine Gavrilov
Linux Leader
Optibase Ltd
7 Shenkar St, Herzliya 46120, Israel
Phone: (972-9)-970-9140
Fax: (972-9)-958-6099
----------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
