On 13 March 2013 11:03, Paul Bolle <pebo...@tiscali.nl> wrote: > On Wed, 2013-03-13 at 10:51 +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote: >> The actual accepted Kconfig symbol names are different though, so they >> should be changed in rt2x00 to match them (SOC_RT288X and SOC_RT305X). > > Thanks. Note that I could not find an actual Kconfig symbol SOC_RT288X!
Ah, yes, the inital submission only included RT305X support, not RT288X (and neither of the newer chips). These will come later. > Anyhow, I guess somebody has the (trivial) patch to convert > RALINK_RT...X and CONFIG_RALINK_RT...X to their SOC_* equivalents queued > for inclusion in v3.9-rcX. Is that correct? Yes, that should be everything. John Crispin, anything missing from that? Jonas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
