On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 12:34 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Remove the certificate date checks that are performed when a certificate is
> parsed.  There are two checks: a valid from and a valid to.  The first check 
> is
> causing a lot of problems with system clocks that don't keep good time and the
> second places an implicit expiry date upon the kernel when used for module
> signing, so do we really need them?

While the date check is entirely bogus for the specific case of module
signing, I don't think we necessarily ought to rip it out of our generic
X.509 support entirely.

Some use cases *might* want to check the dates, and should be permitted
to do so. Just don't refuse to even *parse* the key outside its valid
date range... :)

-- 
David Woodhouse                            Open Source Technology Centre
david.woodho...@intel.com                              Intel Corporation

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Reply via email to