2013/3/20 Peter Zijlstra <pet...@infradead.org>: > On Wed, 2013-03-20 at 16:43 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2013 at 04:05:46PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> > On Thu, 2013-02-14 at 14:48 +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote: >> > > Commit 88b8dac0 makes load_balance() consider other cpus in its group. >> > > But, in that, there is no code for preventing to re-select dst-cpu. >> > > So, same dst-cpu can be selected over and over. >> > > >> > > This patch add functionality to load_balance() in order to exclude >> > > cpu which is selected once. >> > >> > Oh man.. seriously? Did you see this happen? Also, can't we simply >> > remove it from lb->cpus? >> >> I didn't see it, I do just logical thinking. :) >> lb->cpus is for source cpus and dst-cpu is for dest cpus. So, it doesn't >> works to remove it from lb->cpus. > > How about we interpret ->cpus as the total mask to balance; so both > source and destination. That way clearing a cpu means we won't take nor > put tasks on it.
In my quick thought, it may be possible. I will try to do it. Thanks. > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in > the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/