> * you've ignored the robustness of design behind the UNIX kernel. > These beasts keep going without falling apart even after serious injuries. Do you mean design or operation? In fact UNIX design has a number of serious errors/problems, we just have gotten accustomed to it so much that we don't care any more. Here the robustness is in fact inertia. Robust operation is possible with any halfway cleanly designed system, cf. VMS. Olaf - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: Request for comment -- a better ... Roger Gammans
- Re: Request for comment -- a better ... esr
- Re: Request for comment -- a better ... Horst von Brand
- Re: Request for comment -- a better ... Roger Gammans
- Re: Request for comment -- a better ... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system Alexander Viro
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution syste... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution s... Rik van Riel
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attributi... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution s... Alexander Viro
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution s... Alan Cox
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution system Horst von Brand
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution syste... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution s... Rik van Riel