On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 1:26 PM, Dave Jones <da...@redhat.com> wrote: > > those are qstr's, so I used d_name.name, right ?
Yup. And if you want to, you could do p1->d_parent->d_name.name too, just to make things obvious. It's technically racy, but by the time the bug happens, who cares? > I'd be surprised actually, I've got sysfs excluded from its list of victim > files, > due to unrelated issues still unresolved. So unless it followed a symlink > into > sys from somewhere in /proc or /dev... > > It took a few hours to reproduce last time, I'll increase the number of child > processes to see if I can trigger it faster now that I have the debug stuff > in there. Hmm, ok. Do you have any network mounts or fuse or other "odd" filesystems etc? The whole "aliased inodes" thing might come from something like that. Linus -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/