On Mon, 23 Apr 2001, David L. Parsley wrote: > What I'm not sure of is which solution is actually 'better' - I'm > guessing that performance-wise, neither will make a noticable > difference, so I guess memory usage would be the deciding factor. If I Bindings are faster on lookup. For obvious reasons - in case of symlinks you do name resolution every time you traverse the link; in case of bindings it is done when you create them. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Can't read SCSI TAPE Masaki Tsuji
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind m... Andreas Dilger
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind m... Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind m... Andreas Dilger
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind m... Ingo Oeser
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind m... Trond Myklebust
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind m... Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind m... Trond Myklebust
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mount... Christoph Rohland
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? David L. Parsley
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Ed Tomlinson
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Andreas Dilger
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Erik Mouw
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoint... Andreas Dilger
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mount... Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mount... Erik Mouw
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mount... Christoph Rohland
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Andreas Dilger
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoint... Alexander Viro