On Friday, March 22, 2013 10:51:05 AM [email protected] wrote: > From: Dirk Brandewie <[email protected]> > > Use the correct pstate value to calculate the effective frequency. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=923942 > Reported-by: Satish Balay <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Dirk Brandewie <[email protected]>
Well, another quick fix for v3.9 I suppose? May I please be sent CCs of such things to at least one of my addresses? Rafael > --- > drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > index e84af66..ad72922 100644 > --- a/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c > @@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_calc_busy(struct cpudata > *cpu, > sample->idletime_us * 100, > sample->duration_us); > core_pct = div64_u64(sample->aperf * 100, sample->mperf); > - sample->freq = cpu->pstate.turbo_pstate * core_pct * 1000; > + sample->freq = cpu->pstate.max_pstate * core_pct * 1000; > > sample->core_pct_busy = div_s64((sample->pstate_pct_busy * core_pct), > 100); > -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
