3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardw...@google.com>
[ Upstream commit aab2b4bf224ef8358d262f95b568b8ad0cecf0a0 ]
We should not update ts_recent and call tcp_rcv_rtt_measure_ts() both
before and after going to step5. That wastes CPU and double-counts the
receiver-side RTT sample.
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardw...@google.com>
Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eduma...@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <da...@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <b...@decadent.org.uk>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_input.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c
@@ -5494,6 +5494,9 @@ int tcp_rcv_established(struct sock *sk,
if (tcp_checksum_complete_user(sk, skb))
goto csum_error;
+ if ((int)skb->truesize > sk->sk_forward_alloc)
+ goto step5;
+
/* Predicted packet is in window by definition.
* seq == rcv_nxt and rcv_wup <= rcv_nxt.
* Hence, check seq<=rcv_wup reduces to:
@@ -5505,9 +5508,6 @@ int tcp_rcv_established(struct sock *sk,
tcp_rcv_rtt_measure_ts(sk, skb);
- if ((int)skb->truesize > sk->sk_forward_alloc)
- goto step5;
-
NET_INC_STATS_BH(sock_net(sk),
LINUX_MIB_TCPHPHITS);
/* Bulk data transfer: receiver */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
