Hi Al, On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Alexander Viro wrote: > So yes, IMO having such patches available _is_ a good thing. And in > 2.5 we definitely want them in the tree. If encapsulation part gets > there during 2.4 and separate allocation is available for all of > them it will be easier to do without PITA in process. OK I will do that for tmpfs soon. And I will do the symlink inlining with that patch. Greetings Christoph - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Rik van Riel
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Andreas Dilger
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Jan Harkes
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? David Woodhouse
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? David Woodhouse
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Christoph Rohland
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? David Woodhouse
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Christoph Rohland
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? David L. Parsley
- [Patch] inline symlinks for tmpfs Christoph Rohland
- [Patch] encapsulate shmem access to shmem_inode_info Christoph Rohland
- [Resend] Collection of tmpfs patches Christoph Rohland
- Can't read SCSI TAPE Masaki Tsuji
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Andreas Dilger
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Alexander Viro
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Andreas Dilger
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Ingo Oeser
- Re: hundreds of mount --bind mountpoints? Trond Myklebust