> Well, would it be possible to create some module under LGPL, and then > have included it into the kernel? Maybe it needs to maintain the LGPL > version out of the kernel, and transform a copy to the GPL before > submitting? There is kernel code under a whole variety of licenses. When linked together the resulting work is GPL but many of the pieces used on their own or in conjunction with different code are not GPL. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Request for comment -- a better attribution system Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution ... Karsten Keil
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution ... Francois Romieu
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a bett... Giacomo A. Catenazzi
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -- a ... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comment -... Markus Schaber
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for comme... Alan Cox
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request for ... Giacomo Catenazzi
- Re: [kbuild-devel] Request ... Alan Cox
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution ... Andi Kleen
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribution ... Albert D. Cahalan
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribut... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attribut... Alexander Viro
- Re: Request for comment -- a better attr... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Request for comment -- a better ... Francois Romieu
- Re: Request for comment -- a be... Eric S. Raymond
- Re: Request for comment -- ... Francois Romieu