>From b2277a4e655c0858da7d85b99f0925abeedc3b6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2013 23:27:41 -0700

8864b4e59 ("workqueue: implement get/put_pwq()") implemented pwq
(pool_workqueue) refcnting which frees workqueue when the last pwq
goes away.  It determined whether it was the last pwq by testing
wq->pwqs is empty.  Unfortunately, the test was done outside wq->mutex
and multiple pwq release could race and try to free wq multiple times
leading to oops.

Test wq->pwqs emptiness while holding wq->mutex.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <t...@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/workqueue.c | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
index 04a8b98..4d34432 100644
--- a/kernel/workqueue.c
+++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
@@ -3534,6 +3534,7 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct 
*work)
                                                  unbound_release_work);
        struct workqueue_struct *wq = pwq->wq;
        struct worker_pool *pool = pwq->pool;
+       bool is_last;
 
        if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND)))
                return;
@@ -3545,6 +3546,7 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct 
*work)
         */
        mutex_lock(&wq->mutex);
        list_del_rcu(&pwq->pwqs_node);
+       is_last = list_empty(&wq->pwqs);
        mutex_unlock(&wq->mutex);
 
        put_unbound_pool(pool);
@@ -3554,7 +3556,7 @@ static void pwq_unbound_release_workfn(struct work_struct 
*work)
         * If we're the last pwq going away, @wq is already dead and no one
         * is gonna access it anymore.  Free it.
         */
-       if (list_empty(&wq->pwqs))
+       if (is_last)
                kfree(wq);
 }
 
-- 
1.8.1.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to