On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:05:18AM +0100, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> > > +
> > > +         ocram: ocram@f8000000 {
> > > +                 compatible = "fsl,imx-ocram", "mmio-sram";
> > 
> > We should probably just drop "fsl,imx-ocram".
> > 
> > Shawn
> 
> I thought that in the future somebody might want to implement some i.MX
> OCRAM specifics in a different driver, like the L2 cache / OCRAM mode
> switching, the timing settings, or the TrustZone bits that are
> configurable in the IOMUXC GPR registers.

We can add i.MX OCRAM specific compatible when we see that real need.
Also, generally we should use a specific chip/osc name rather than "imx"
for compatible to specify the particular hardware version.

Shawn

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to