On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 03:54 -0700, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> This is mostly for cleanup value:
> 
> - We don't need several gotos to handle the case where the first
>   waiter is a writer. Two simple tests will do (and generate very
>   similar code).
> 
> - In the remainder of the function, we know the first waiter is a reader,
>   so we don't have to double check that. We can use do..while loops
>   to iterate over the readers to wake (generates slightly better code).
> 
> Signed-off-by: Michel Lespinasse <[email protected]>
> 
> ---
>  lib/rwsem-spinlock.c | 25 ++++++++-----------------
>  lib/rwsem.c          | 26 ++++++++++++--------------
>  2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c b/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c
> index 5f117f37ac0a..20207a6e8ac3 100644
> --- a/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c
> +++ b/lib/rwsem-spinlock.c
> @@ -70,26 +70,17 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wakewrite)
>  
>       waiter = list_entry(sem->wait_list.next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
>  
> -     if (!wakewrite) {
> -             if (waiter->type == RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE)
> -                     goto out;
> -             goto dont_wake_writers;
> -     }
> -
> -     /*
> -      * as we support write lock stealing, we can't set sem->activity
> -      * to -1 here to indicate we get the lock. Instead, we wake it up
> -      * to let it go get it again.
> -      */
>       if (waiter->type == RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE) {
> -             wake_up_process(waiter->task);
> +             if (wakewrite)
> +                     /* Wake up a writer. Note that we do not grant it the
> +                      * lock - it will have to acquire it when it runs. */
> +                     wake_up_process(waiter->task);
>               goto out;
>       }
>  
> -     /* grant an infinite number of read locks to the front of the queue */
> - dont_wake_writers:
> +     /* grant read locks to all queued readers. */

I think the original comment still applies here now?

>       woken = 0;
> -     while (waiter->type == RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_READ) {
> +     do {
>               struct list_head *next = waiter->list.next;
>  
>               list_del(&waiter->list);
> @@ -99,10 +90,10 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wakewrite)
>               wake_up_process(tsk);
>               put_task_struct(tsk);
>               woken++;
> -             if (list_empty(&sem->wait_list))
> +             if (next == &sem->wait_list)
>                       break;
>               waiter = list_entry(next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
> -     }
> +     } while (waiter->type != RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE);

Maybe convert this to list_for_each_entry_safe() since you're cleaning
it up?

>  
>       sem->activity += woken;
>  
> diff --git a/lib/rwsem.c b/lib/rwsem.c
> index 0d50e46d5b0c..9a675fa9d78e 100644
> --- a/lib/rwsem.c
> +++ b/lib/rwsem.c
> @@ -68,20 +68,17 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wake_type)
>       signed long woken, loop, adjustment;
>  
>       waiter = list_entry(sem->wait_list.next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
> -     if (waiter->type != RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE)
> -             goto readers_only;
> -
> -     if (wake_type == RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED)
> -             /* Another active reader was observed, so wakeup is not
> -              * likely to succeed. Save the atomic op.
> -              */
> +     if (waiter->type == RWSEM_WAITING_FOR_WRITE) {
> +             if (wake_type != RWSEM_WAKE_READ_OWNED)
> +                     /* Wake writer at the front of the queue, but do not
> +                      * grant it the lock yet as we want other writers
> +                      * to be able to steal it.  Readers, on the other hand,
> +                      * will block as they will notice the queued writer.
> +                      */
> +                     wake_up_process(waiter->task);
>               goto out;
> +     }
>  
> -     /* Wake up the writing waiter and let the task grab the sem: */
> -     wake_up_process(waiter->task);
> -     goto out;
> -
> - readers_only:
>       /* If we come here from up_xxxx(), another thread might have reached
>        * rwsem_down_failed_common() before we acquired the spinlock and
>        * woken up a waiter, making it now active.  We prefer to check for
> @@ -125,7 +122,8 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wake_type)
>       rwsem_atomic_add(adjustment, sem);
>  
>       next = sem->wait_list.next;
> -     for (loop = woken; loop > 0; loop--) {
> +     loop = woken;
> +     do {
>               waiter = list_entry(next, struct rwsem_waiter, list);
>               next = waiter->list.next;
>               tsk = waiter->task;
> @@ -133,7 +131,7 @@ __rwsem_do_wake(struct rw_semaphore *sem, int wake_type)
>               waiter->task = NULL;
>               wake_up_process(tsk);
>               put_task_struct(tsk);
> -     }
> +     } while (--loop);
>  
>       sem->wait_list.next = next;
>       next->prev = &sem->wait_list;


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to