hayeswang <hayesw...@realtek.com> : > Francois Romieu [mailto:rom...@fr.zoreil.com] > [...] > > Your description suggests that testing against the link > > partner ability to work at 10M instead of testing for ^^^^^^^^^^ -> "and" > > tp->link_ok could be good enough.
As a policy we may assume that capabilities of the link partner won't change after a link loss event - and there is currently no way we can change this policy - but it won't always work as expected (especially if "expected == automagically"). [...] > Furthermore, should it not speed down without linking, even though the cable > would be plugged after suspending or shutdowning? I don't get your point. Can you reformulate ? -- Ueimor -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
