Instead of just enabling the settings that were disabled in the 1st
loop, it's simpler to recall pinctrl_select_state with the old state.

Signed-off-by: Richard Genoud <richard.gen...@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/pinctrl/core.c |   22 +++-------------------
 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
index ddd9a150..caf9bf9 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/core.c
@@ -937,26 +937,10 @@ unapply_new_state:
                        pinmux_disable_setting(setting2);
        }
 
-       if (old_state) {
-               list_for_each_entry(setting, &old_state->settings, node) {
-                       bool found = false;
-                       if (setting->type != PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP)
-                               continue;
-                       list_for_each_entry(setting2, &state->settings, node) {
-                               if (setting2->type != PIN_MAP_TYPE_MUX_GROUP)
-                                       continue;
-                               if (setting2->data.mux.group ==
-                                               setting->data.mux.group) {
-                                       found = true;
-                                       break;
-                               }
-                       }
-                       if (!found)
-                               pinmux_enable_setting(setting);
-               }
-       }
+       /* There's no infinite recursive loop here because p->state is NULL */
+       if (old_state)
+               pinctrl_select_state_locked(p, old_state);
 
-       p->state = old_state;
        return ret;
 }
 
-- 
1.7.2.5

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to