On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:40:03AM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > So the scheduler does know what it's doing after all, which is a nice > news. Given the result, the best thing to do would be somehow marking > these workqueues as unbound for powersaving?
BTW, recent changes to workqueue means that it shouldn't be too difficult to create a combined workqueue which distributes work items to both per-cpu and unbound worker pools depending on cpu_idle(), but, at least for now, I think we can make do with much coarser approach. We can refine it afterwards. Thanks. -- tejun -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
