On Mon, Apr 01, 2013 at 02:25:03AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com> > > The ACPI handle of struct i2c_adapter's dev member should not be > set, because this causes that struct i2c_adapter to be associated > with the ACPI device node corresponding to its parent as the > second "physical_device", which is incorrect (this happens during > the registration of struct i2c_adapter). Consequently, > acpi_i2c_register_devices() should use the ACPI handle of the > parent of the struct i2c_adapter it is called for rather than the > struct i2c_adapter's ACPI handle (which should be NULL). > > Make that happen and modify the i2c-designware-platdrv driver, > which currently is the only driver for ACPI-enumerated I2C > controller chips, not to set the ACPI handle for the > struct i2c_adapter it creates. > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
Shall this go via the I2C tree? If not, for the I2C part: Acked-by: Wolfram Sang <w...@the-dreams.de> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
