> > > I know that Lee's been sending off a large set of regulator patches > > > lately, some include alterations to this platform config. > > > > > Maybe it's better to take this patch into the regulator tree if these > > > machine configs will come in that way? Also like Lee to have a > > > look at this... > > > > If it's touching the board constraints it's likely to have conflicts > > with Lee's stuff, yes. > > Lee's patches are on -next
Not all of them are on -next, but all are on the MLs. I'm currently fixing up some of Mark's review comments in order to re-submit the remainder. > and should not conflict with this one > (tested again on today's tree), but it may be nice anyway to have this > in the regulator framework with the others. > Mark, would you consider taking this one in your tree? -- Lee Jones Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
